Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pawel Juszczak vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Juszczak vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Pawel Juszczak vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Juszczak 1 - 0 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Juszczak has won 55.38% of points on their second serve, while Michalski has won 50.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Juszczak, in recent form, has won 54.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.76% and 35.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Juszczak has saved 59.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Juszczak has won 69.81% of matches played (W/L 37/ 16), with Michalski winning 55% (W/L 33/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Juszczak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 249/ 154), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 185/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Juszczak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.34% of matches (W/L 34/ 13), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Juszczak winning 1 times and Michalski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Juszczak winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Juszczak and Michalski was at the Poland F7 (Bydgoszcz), 15-08-2018, Second, Clay with Pawel Juszczak getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Juszczak and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Juszczak winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Juszczak winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Juszczak has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.57 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 248.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Juszczak has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Juszczak has converted 53.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 47.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
584
Rank
393
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
395
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
61% (313-196)
Career Total W/L
62% (218-134)
74% (26-9)
YTD W/L
51% (18-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Pawel Juszczak vs Daniel Michalski For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Juszczak VS Michalski
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Pawel Juszczak | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (22/46) | 77% (61/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (16/22) | 52% (32/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (5/17) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (40/79) | 33% (15/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Daniel Michalski
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pawel Juszczak | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (26/9) | 51% (18/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (56/25) | 51% (42/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (419/321) | 50% (391/386) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (26/9) | 60% (15/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 53 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:12 | 1:59:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 67.4 | 331.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1476/2377) | 61% (1595/2606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (920/1476) | 64% (1014/1595) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (499/901) | 50% (506/1011) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (144/268) | 47% (118/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1045/2354) | 42% (1062/2530) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (12/14) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (26/9) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (26/33) | 51% (18/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 75% (9/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (24/23) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (24/1) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 13% (16/2) |
Pawel Juszczak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Pawel Juszczak
72%
(
90 of
125)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
53 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
112
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Sebastian Sorger
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Patrick Zahraj
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
49%
(
58 of
119)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
10
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
64%
(
30 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Adan Freire Da Silva
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Pawel Juszczak
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Tanguy Genier
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
107)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Yuvan Nandal
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Pawel Juszczak
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
29
Total Points Won
27
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Juszczak Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Juszczak are available here and Michalski photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Pawel Juszczak
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
